8½ (1963)
November 26th, 2003 at 8:16 am (3 - Enjoyed it)
Much has been written about Federico Fellini’s Neo-Realistic classic 8½ (1963) by better men than me. Rather than bore you with another pseudo-intellectual analysis of the surrealistic film I will direct you to some of the plethora of professional reviews and share some of my personal impressions.

I remember the first time I saw this movie. I must have been about 12 years old and got it a video store with my dad who loves Italian Cinema. I had a hard time concentrating on the movie and was at numerous times tempted to fall asleep. I remember that even though the black and white movie seemed boring and hard to follow it also had an undeniable charm that made me wish I knew more about the codex so I could understand it better. Now, almost twenty years later seeing the movie again (this time in a film class with the benefit of a great introduction from a film professor) I found myself re-living the experience of my childhood. With the benefit of more maturity, a year of film studies and a lot more movies under my belt I think I ‘got’ a lot more of what Fellini was trying to convey but still had a hard time keeping my attention on the screen, and thinking through the layer of what is being presented down to the meaning.

Don’t get me wrong, I still enjoy the movie greatly. Marcello Mastroianni is a masterful actor and fills his character with life and complexity. I have great regard for any director with the moxy to intersperse his narrative with fantasy and dream sequences and get away with it. I specially enjoy the Harem fantasy, which lightly pokes fun at the desire of men to be loved and in control, not by any means of exaggeration but through a brutal honesty that is at times disturbing. I definitely recommend 8½ to anyone interested in the art of cinema. After you watch it though, you may want to do some reading to help you figure out what just happened.
Nick said,
November 26, 2003 at 3:07 pm
To me, Fellini is like vague poetry in comparison to a novel or short story. He makes stuff that’s pretty and has moments, but lacks the narrative or explicit meaning to really connect. I can understand why some people really like it, but it’s not for me.